IPFS News Link • Vaccines and Vaccinations
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Vaccines and Vaccinations
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Arizona's Top News
Arizona Republican Party Declares Covid-19 Injections Biological and Technological Weapons...
News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
When you were distracted by the "Where's Princess Kate Conspiracy", Deagel's Depop
News Link •
Science, Medicine and Technology
'Higher Pregnancy Rate for the Unvaccinated' Compared to COVID-19 Jabbed in IVF Study:
News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
Australian court rules employers who mandated jab legally liable for injuries
Feature Article •
Corruption
EU TYRANNY: German MEP Christine Anderson Has Her Microphone Cut Off in the EU Parliament...
News Link •
Robots and Artificial Intelligence
Physician Claims ChatGPT Is Programmed To "Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy"
News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
Biden Admin-commissioned report concludes Pfizer & Moderna mRNA shots cause myocarditis
News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
Epidemic of 15-19 Year Olds Dropping Dead in Schools and Dorms Across USA and Canada...
News Link •
Robots and Artificial Intelligence
Nanobots That Release Toxins And Harvest Energy From the Body
News Link •
China
2 Comments in Response to Vaccination rights attorney Patricia Finn threatened with criminal charges
It's called Judaical murder
It's never too late to flog a deceased equine.
That being said, the recipriocal demonizations occuring in this situation distract from core rights issues.
In FP 78, Hamilton asserted that Congress was supposed to pass legislation which reflected the will of (We) the people. If Congress substituted its will for that of the people, the courts were supposed to intervene in favor of the people.
Of course, Hamiltion said this at a time when he needed votes for ratification. Once ratification was obtained, of Hamilton, it is said, every time he was offered a chance to vote on a measure that increased the power of the federal government, he voted FOR it.
Doubtless, Hamilton reveled in the supremacy clause. Also doubtless, he probably did NOT revel in the 10th amendment.
The 10th amendment affirms the people's concurrence with Hamilton's (empty) promise made by him in FP 78.
Those who argue in favor of States' rights overlook the last phrase in the 10th amendment, namely
. . . reserved . . . to the people.
Vaccination choices should be reserved to the people.
It being that such choices would not likely lead to riot or invasion, the federal government would have been hands off in 1789, and even moreso in 1791.
But according to the article above, this controversy originates in a state court.
(Maybe the anti-statists are right!)
I think I'll give the decease equine a rest at this point.
DC Treybil