Article Image

IPFS News Link • Vin Suprynowicz's Columns Archive

Stacked to convict

• http://www.vinsuprynowicz.com

Typically, you'll end up sitting around for hours with a bunch of senior citizens in sweat pants, watching daytime TV or reading out-of-date magazines. And I don't mean "Scientific American."

Occasionally, they actually go so far as to march a couple dozen of you into an otherwise empty courtroom, where a judge and a couple of attorneys question the gang, first as a group and then individually, to find out if you're familiar with any of the principals in the case, or have been prejudiced by watching TV news accounts of the crime, whatever.

At some point, if you make it into the "first 15" in the box (three will be alternates), the judge will ask if you think you can render an objective verdict based on the evidence. If they stopped there, I'd have no big problem. But most will go beyond that, asking whether you will swear to "take the law as I give it to you."

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by PureTrust
Entered on:

There is nothing wrong with taking the law as "they" give it to you. No matter what they give you, if it is not the law, they are not giving you the law. The law always is that there must be harm or damage for there to be a trial. The law always is that the plaintiff must get on the stand and speak into the record the harm or damage done - and there needs to be REAL harm or damage - and prove it was you who did it. Any judge or attorney who doesn't have these two things as the greater portion of what they are telling you, is not talking any law to you.



thelibertyadvisor.com/declare