IPFS News Link • Bill of Rights
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Bill of Rights
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Constitution
Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Many Ways Our Rights Have Been Usurped Since 9/11
News Link •
Revolutions, Rebellions & Uprisings
PICTURED: The 37-year-old who set himself on FIRE outside Trump hush-money trial
News Link •
Censorship
Elon Musk on Racism, Bailing Out Trump, Hate Speech, and More - The Don Lemon Show (Full Interview)
News Link •
Biden-Harris Deep Fake Administration
LIVE: President Biden will deliver his State of the Union address tonight
News Link •
Politics: Democratic Campaigns
Kyrsten Sinema announces she is retiring from the Senate (Progressive Independent - AZ)
News Link •
Biden-Harris Deep Fake Administration
U.S. Under Secretary Victoria Nuland resigns. After Massive Disaster in Ukraine
News Link •
Revolutions, Rebellions & Uprisings
Tucker Carlson: "People Should Be Preparing, This Is So Serious" (Publisher Recommended)
News Link •
Entertainment: Sports
2 Comments in Response to Honor Madison today for Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights didn't apply to the States and for the most part, all went according to State Constitutions for 150 years regarding the Bill of Rights because our rights were also protected in State Constitutions according to the people in each State's desire to protect or limit whatever rights they felt served society best. Even after the 14th Amendment, the State Constitution was the authority and only Congress could step in under the power of the 14th to correct injustice. For that first 150 years, the Court left things to the states even when they shouldn't.
For example, in 1875 when Congress, Constitutionally, under the power of the 14th banned segregation, the Court overruled them and we had segregation for another 80 years. All 50 states have God in their State Constitutions and we had State Religions until 1833 with at one time or another 12 of the 13 states having them and they were "Constitutional" under original intent which Jefferson said religon was a "state issue" that the federal government was banned from interfering in.
In 1833, even the U.S. Supreme Court in Barron vs. Baltimore ruled that the Bill of Rights didn't apply to state powers. Yet, few know of that ruling today or that for 150 years the Bill of Rights didn't apply to state powers. The intent was to limit federal power and that intent was honorable. But, now we have destroyed original intent and use what was a limit on federal power to "overpower" States who were constitutionally able to limit speech, and have religious relationships with government.
Read some of the State Constitutions where the "protestant" religion was the state religion or that you not only had to believe in God, but be a "protestant" to hold public office. They also limited the clergy from holding office while serving in that role. All were Constitutional as long as covered by the State Constitution because the Bill of Rights was not a limit on the State power "we the people" decided for ourselves in each state.
Thus, we had laws against public profanity, obscenity, adultery, homosexuality, vagrancy, lewd and lascivious behavior, nudity, fornication, etc. We still have 20 or so states today where adultery is illegal and they were all constitutional because each state had a Constitution to use to limit state power that "we the people" could amend in each state just as the states could amend the U.S. Constitution.
To debate the Bill of Rights and whether they have served us well or not, should not be the debate. It should be how do we return to the original intent of limiting the power of the Federal Government while preserving the right of "we the people" in each state to govern their own society.
Were Henry alive today, upon reading this "journalist's" screed, would undoubtedly repeat the above oath.