In answer to your question (about current events surrounding the Syrian crisis), I guess all I can say is that I'm as ready as I can
be. Which, if some of what you refer to is true, (which I doubt) then I'm
probably not nearly ready enough. But then, who's ever really ready for the
worst-case scenario?
My belief is that this is just
the latest evidence that the U.S. (now, unarguably, Obama's U.S.) continues to
follow the
blueprint laid out by the NeoCon
Project for
a New American Century back in September 2000. That, in a nutshell, was the
plan to conquer the middle east and establish the U.S. as THE preeminent world
military power. I'd estimate that it's a 20-year plan that's more or less on
schedule. It specifically lists Iran, Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and even Egypt
as strategic targets for overthrow (whether by invasion or by Arab Spring). The
price tag is trillion$ and counting. In my opinion, the result of it is that the
rest of the world, including our allies, have come to view the U.S. in the same
way that Nazi Germany was viewed by the late-1930s - and for the same
reasons.
"I am now a Keynesian." - Richard Nixon, August 1971
"I am now a NeoCon." - Barack Obama,
September 2013 ?
From what I understand, Obama met with leaders
of the banking and financial industry recently. In all likelihood that meeting
was a heads-up that something serious was about to go down. Hence, the possible
or likely invasion of Syria. It's just as likely that they met to
order the
invasion as cover for a serious, negative financial event that is imminent -
think September 2008. The Syrian invasion has sat conveniently on the back
burner since Obama drew his "line in the sand" at the beginning of this year.
All we can do is speculate as to what really took place in that meeting. We'll
know it's just cover if a bank such as Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, or
Barclay's fails in the midst of this Syrian "crisis". Don't forget to "Watch the
Birdie!"
The real danger in all of this is the brinksmanship between the
U.S. and Russia over Syria. Syria is a longtime ally of Russia and Russia
maintains a vital (from their perspective) Mediterranean naval port in Syria.
They have made no secret of their opposition to any military action against
Syria absent a U.N. mandate. NATO thinks it can act unilaterally without U.N.
approval. The looming question is - What will Russia do if the U.S., under the
guise of NATO, invades Syria without U.N. approval? Some think it could be the
start of WWIII. Remember, unlike Syria, Russia has very real weapons of mass
destruction.
Anyhow, that's my view of the
situation. Desperate times call for desperate measures and for the banksters who
run the U.S. these are
very desperate times. Obviously there isn't
anything we can do to change it, but I can at least take a little solace in the
fact that I'm no longer financing it. I'll certainly let you know if I hear of
anything useful or significant as things develop.
1 Comments in Response to Watch the Birdie! -- Why Syria? and Why now?
Attack on syria? 50-50. Failure of one of these:
Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, or Barclay's
to which I will add Wells Fargo And chase. --- about zero. This is just the typical Right wing selling of FUD to the chicken little membership who, if there were not afraid of something would be unhappy. My $100 to your $20, that none of these banks fail before the end of 2013, Syria war or not. I do not mean take over by another bank, I mean fail as in bail out, or Gov takeover.
I will be surprised if there are any takers.