The COVID-19 vaccine was the "miracle that wasn't," the "little engine that couldn't," and a "job too big for a jab too small."

After years of waiting for Pfizer to be held accountable in a court of law, justice may be on the horizon for millions who took a shot they thought would keep them from getting COVID-19 and spreading it to others. Just two doses of a 95% effective vaccine with no serious side effects whatsoever, and we were told the COVID-19 pandemic would find its rightful place in our rearview mirror.

In reality, Pfizer's vaccine is about 0% effective at actually preventing COVID-19 and comes with a wide array of potential side effects that are far worse than COVID-19 itself—such as blood clots, heart damage, and death. But with its clever marketing, an uncanny ability to hide clinical trial data, and federal regulatory agencies in its back pocket, you would never know it.

We all know now—or should know at this point—that Pfizer sold the world a lemon and probably felt that it could because of the expansive amount of immunity it enjoys courtesy of our federal government.

Enter the great state of Texas.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Nov. 30 filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc., for "unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company's COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product."

"We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies," said Attorney General Paxton in a press release.

The lawsuit, filed in Lubbock County state court, accuses Pfizer of engaging in false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices by making unsupported claims about its COVID-19 vaccine in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.