Do you want Tedros and the UN to tell you what medicine you can or can't have?

This is how the world is silently conquered by Bureaucrats, one subclause at a time. It sounds like something out of a James Bond movie, except so much more believable.  The UN and helpful Oligarchs simple bore their way in with "good intentions" and indecipherable legalese, and most of the world slept through it.

It applies to all 192 countries that signed up to the International Health Regulations (IHR), managed by the WHO in 2005. (So, yes, wherever you live). Here's the sneaky thing, new amendments that change this agreement don't need to be voted on by your Parliament or Congress. They just need to be tabled and 18 months later, "bing" — if no one objects, they are accepted de facto. The only way for a nation to stay out is if your PM or President writes to the WHO and says "No Thanks". That date of rollover "acceptance" is December 1. (Can you believe). And yet, for some reason, almost no MP or media outlet has whispered a word of it. Since they love to tell us how saintly and essential the UN is, we can assume that they're not telling us because they don't think we'll like it.

There are two parts to this — one are the Amendments to the IHR, and the other, but completely separate —  the Pandemic Treaty. If they both slide into place, the WHO could declare an "Emergency" and decide things like whether you should be allowed to take a drug (or even a vitamin), whether you must take some mandatory medical treatment, and things like that. For your own good of course.