There is a difference between being anti-vaccine, and anti-unsafe-vaccine. You could fill in the word 'vaccine' with almost anything. If it isn't safe, why would anybody want to use it? All that RFK is doing is showing that he hasn't been able to get the required-by-law safety studies for vaccines from the CDC and government. And he's been working on this for more than a year. If the CDC or the government have the safety studies, why won't they give them to anybody who asked? It would be in their best interest to do this simple thing. If they DON'T have the studies, then all vaccines that don't have safety studies should be considered unsafe, and not safely usable. The question is between safe and unsafe vaccines.