Fake News Reasons for Breakthrough Flu/Covid Cases

by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org - Home - Stephen Lendman)

According to the CDC, so-called breakthrough flu/covid infections are ones occurring in double-jabbed individuals 14 or more days after getting their second dose.

The agency, fraudster Fauci, and other US/Western public health officials connected to dark forces falsely claim that the vast majority of flu/covid outbreaks occur in the unjabbed.

According to science they ignore, it's largely the other way around.

Nations with the largest percent of their population jabbed have the highest incidence of outbreaks.

Jabbing creates them. Unjabbed individuals are safest from contracting the virus.

Official claims otherwise are science-denying Big Lies.

So are phony explanations of what causes breakthrough infections.

A fake news Scientific American article downplayed them, saying:

They "leave the mistaken impression (sic) that protections afforded by (jabs) are not working."

There are no protections, just irreversible harm from health destroying toxins in jabs.

Pharma-connected international health professor Kawsar Talaat dismissively claimed that no inoculations are "100% effective," adding:

A breakthrough infection doesn't automatically assure illness or transmission to others, she added.

Defying science, she falsely claimed that jabs provide "good protection." Reality is the other way around. 

In early August, the CDC falsely reported that "97%" of hospitalized individuals for flu/covid were unjabbed — a bald-faced Big Lie.

Jabbed individuals comprise most hospitalizations.

Epidemiology professor Tara Smith also defied science, saying flu/covid infected people "tend to be less likely to transmit (sic)."

Viral infections aren't transmitted by uninfected and asymptomatic people, just infected ones. 

Immunity comes from infection and recovery, not jabs.

The more jabs gotten, the greater the chance for reinfection, not the other way around as Scientific American falsely claimed, adding:

Flu/covid jabs "neutralize…variants effectively (sic)."

"Breakthrough rates can increase if the (jabbed) population is small (sic)."

It's the other way around on both counts.

On all things flu/covid, the publication should be named Unscientific American.

Unsurprisingly, the Pharma-controlled CDC recommends booster jabs for "people who are immunocompromised."

Pfizer is pushing them with bottom line considerations in mind — falsely claiming they provide greater protection from the delta scariant.

Claims by establishment media  that "fully" jabbed people are highly protected against flu/covid infection, hospitalization and death are polar opposite reality.

Putting a brave face on breakthrough cases, CNBC said none of the flu/covid jabs are "100% effective" — instead of saying they're designed to irreversibly harm health and shorten lifespans.

CNBC falsely claimed that the delta scariant "complicated the efficacy picture (sic)."

It's virtually identical to other strains, claims otherwise all about fear-mongering maximum numbers of people to self-inflict harm.

As Doctors for Covid Ethics explained, jabs don't protect. They're unneeded, ineffective and unsafe.

Shunning them is crucial to stay uninfected and safe.

CNBC quoted virologist Lawrence Young saying:

"There will always be a proportion of individuals who will still remain susceptible to infection and illness."

"There are also two other factors that impact vaccine effectiveness:" 

"(1) waning immunity (sic). We still don't know how long (jabbed)-induced protective immunity lasts." 

"This is very likely to be a factor in those elderly and more vulnerable individuals who were (jabbed) early in the rollout program."

"(B)reakthrough infections in (jabbed) individuals (are) due to the more infectious delta" scariant (sic)."

What Young failed to explain matters most. 

Jabs harm. They don't protect. 

They increase outbreaks. 

All things delta scariant is state-sponsored subterfuge.

As for numbers of outbreaks — breakthroughs or otherwise — what's officially reported and reality are worlds apart.

Nothing from US/Western regimes, their public health handmaidens, and press agent media can be taken at face value.

On August 6, Joseph Mercola reported that "Moderna received 300,000 reports of (adverse flu/covid) side effects in 3 months" after jabbing with its mRNA drug began

Is the total over a million now, the same true for Pfizer and J & J.

Information these companies have on harm to health from their flu/covid drugs is not included in CDC VAERS data.

Virtually everyone jabbed for flu/covid in the West and elsewhere — using Western drugs — was harmed.

They're designed to cause permanent harm, not protect and preserve health as publicly claimed.

Yet establishment media falsely claim that adverse events and deaths from flu/covid jabs are small in numbers compared to the toll on unjabbed people.

Virtually all things reported about flu/covid in the West has been fake news intended to harm health, not protect and preserve it.

VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.org (Home - Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

My two Wall Street books are timely reading:

"How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War"

https://www.claritypress.com/product/how-wall-street-fleeces-america/

"Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity"

https://www.claritypress.com/product/banker-occupation-waging-financial-war-on-humanity/

streamingclarity.global