For years, the medical establishment – with the help of big government, big media and big tech – have tried to bury concerns about the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Now, facing an avalanche of evidence about how dangerous and ineffective these shots are, big pharma's defenders are turning up efforts to censor there critics.

In a recent substack, Dr. Peter McCullough, blew the lid on what he called a "stunning act of scientific censorship" after,

"a little known publication integrity staffer Tim Kersjes has retracted a manuscript authored by epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, after the paper drew global attention to the Springer Nature Cureus platform with record views/reads/downloads. The paper called for a halt in COVID-19 mass vaccination based on a valid evaluation of the evidence. It topped >330,000 views/reads/downloads in a month as compared to an average Cureus-promoted paper which has only ~2700 in a year."