Will domestic abusers be allowed guns? Will President Biden be allowed to impose a wealth tax on the richest Americans? Will an attorney win the right to use a joke about Donald Trump's manhood on a t-shirt?

These are the questions the Supreme Court justices will answer when they take up new cases in the next term, which begins the first week of October. 

The 6-3 conservative justices delivered a series of bombshell rulings in the last two weeks at the end of an explosive term - including axing Biden's $400 billion student loan bailout and banning colleges from using affirmative action in admissions. 

Another significant decision now means businesses will not be forced to cater to same-sex couples due to religious objections.

The landmark cases won't stop there in 2023, as the justices reconvene later this year to discuss cases that will have nationwide ramifications.  

CAN A CALIFORNIA LAWYER TRADEMARK THE PHRASE 'TRUMP TOO SMALL'?

An attorney in California wants to trademark the phrase 'Trump too small' for his t-shirts mocking the size of former President Donald Trump's hands.

Justices agreed last month to take up the trademark dispute Vidal v. Elster in the fall term. The bench will likely hear the case before the new year.

Steve Elster, an employment lawyer and progressive political activist that teaches child actors, sought the trademark in 2018 as a play off of Florida Sen. Marco Rubio's crude comments during a 2016 presidential debate suggesting that the size of Trump's hands indicates he has a small manhood.