The paper includes a systematic review and meta-analysis of 65 other studies conducted worldwide. All of them provide overwhelming support for what many scientists and doctors have been saying about natural infection versus synthetic injection.

According to the study's funding, acquiring and recovering from covid naturally provides strong, lasting protection against severe health outcomes at a level "as high, if not higher" than the temporary-at-best protection conferred by the experimental shots.

"The Lancet is finally acknowledging what doctors and scientists have been gaslit for saying for years – that natural immunity provides superior protection to experimental vaccines," said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children's Health Defense (CHD).

"Only the tsunami of propaganda and censorship from the pharma / government biosecurity cartel and the controlled media persuaded the public that Pfizer and Moderna were better at protecting the human immune system than God and evolution."

CDC now admits covid jab "immunity" barely lasts at all before turning negative

Even when compared to the immunity allegedly provided by two doses of mRNA (messenger RNA) from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, natural immunity from infection lasts much longer and provides much better protection, the study found.