Article Image

IPFS News Link • Food

Sugar's Not Just Bad for You--It's Bad for Coca-Cola's Business

• http://www.wired.com

Now is not a great time to be in the sugar business.

On the health front, Philadelphia is joining the list of cities that want to tax people on sugar-sweetened drinks, and the Food and Drug Administration just approved a new nutrition label that would place more emphasis on calories and added sugars. Meanwhile, sugar has become a volatile commodity: in the past year, prices have tanked over a dozen times before shooting up over 30 percent this month compared to a year ago.

At the center of all this upheaval sits Coca Cola—the largest beverage company in the world thanks to its eponymous sugar-laden soda. Recently, the company said that, due to a severe sugar shortage in Venezuela, it was suspending production of its signature product in the country as its economy teeters on collapse. Clearly, the politics of sugar have become combustible. Bad politics makes for bad business, which is why Coke is heading down a path that sounds unthinkable for a soda maker: it's weaning itself off the sweet stuff.

Not that the $84 billion multinational conglomerate didn't see this moment coming. It's been planning its own gradual separation from sugar for years—long before the FDA's new labels validated public health officials' claims that sugar was a primary culprit for rising obesity rates in the US and abroad. Perhaps no other company in the world is more keenly aware of the rising cost of sugar, both politically and economically, than Coke. And so the company has worked to aggressively expand its brand while working to lower the sugar content of its classic formula.

In Search of a Sweeter Deal

Take, for example, Coke's attempt to save face and money in the UK, where the company vowed to reduce the number of calories in half its beverages to low or none by 2020, mostly through reducing sugar. "In the last three years, we have invested £15 million in reformulation projects to reduce sugar and calorie content and give consumers greater choice," said Jon Woods, general manager for Coke in the UK and Ireland. In Canada, the company said it would lower the amount of sugar in its products, which used to have about 3 grams more than Coke sold in the US, and start selling drinks in smaller cans.

In the US, the company's first attempt to address a rising sugar backlash came way back in 1982 with the release of Diet Coke. The silver-can formula was originally geared toward dieters in the midst of the female-centric diet soda craze started by Tab. Then came Coke Zero—Diet Coke's sexier twin. In subsequent years, as soda sales across the industry slowed, sales of so-called health drinks like Vitaminwater and juices like Odwalla seemed to pick up the slack. Seeing the direction of the market, Coca Cola bought both, along with a portfolio of similar brands in developing markets like Africa and Latin America.


www.universityofreason.com/a/29887/KWADzukm