Article Image

IPFS News Link • Bill of Rights

The FBI's anticipatory prosecution of Muslims to criminalize speech

• by Glenn Greenwald (The Guardian)
Over the past decade, US Muslims have been routinely targeted with precisely this same tactic of preemptive or anticipatory prosecution. It's all designed to take people engaged in political and religious advocacy which the US government dislikes - usually very young and impressionable Muslims with zero criminal history, though increasingly non-Muslims engaged in other forms of dissent - and use paid informants to trick them into saying just enough to turn them into criminals who are then prosecuted and imprisoned for decades.

2 Comments in Response to

Comment by TL Winslow
Entered on:

And as for me, I became chief of the great warrior tribe. And as for the Road Warrior, he only lives now in our memories.

This sick leftist British article is the symptoms of coming Muslim takeover of Britain, before or after a horrible bloody civil war, along with all of Europe. He can snipe at our FBI all he wants, but the article begs the question of why the U.S. permits Muslim immigration at all when its holy books command all true believers to spread Muslim rule over the whole world to prevent non-Muslims from having any nation to rule or even having any political rights at all, since Allah has consigned them to Hell anyway, and Paradise to them.

Yes, when a nation makes a huge mistake like the U.S. has been doing, all kinds of little guys will get trampled, but this huge mistake threatens the very existence of the Constitution and our way of life. As long as the so-called Muslim World exists, there are very real battle lines, and all Muslims entering the U.S. should rightly be treated as potential foreign agents and enemy combatants. But then, why allow Muslim immigration at all? Is Congress suicidal? I know that Pres. Obama is, because the article fails to point out that he's gutted the FBI and given Muslims a revolving door to the White House in a misguided attempt at appeasement.

The first step Congress needs to take is to pass my proposed Winslow Amendment to the Constitution that allows it to pass laws restricting the free exercise of this one religion that has huge numbers of members and a horrible Muslim World that is just what we don't want extended here. It's a cop-out to claim that jihadists are not 'real' Muslims, because if only 0.1% of Muslims go jihadist, how long until we're facing civil war? No need to theorize, because Europe is sadly going to show us.

The time is running out when we can do what we should have all along, namely, militarily occupy the Muslim World and force the cycle of indoctrination of children to end long enough to end Islam as a political threat forever. The existence of nukes and other WMDs is the loose cannon on deck, causing our options to dwindle daily, but it's still not too late.

As a historyscoper, I wish I could be here 200 years from now and scope the 21st century to find out if it was a nightmare of Muslim takeover of the world in an oceans of blood global jihad that resulted in a New Dark Ages, or whether Islam became kaput because of the wisdom and courage of us non-Muslims. But I can't, so all I can do is play the scratchy hairshirt prophet and warn of the approaching Apocalypse.

Read my Winslow Plan for Defeating Islam. Yes, you might say I'm a kook now, but after Muslims set off WMDs in the U.S. you might be kissing my itchy boils and regretting that you didn't take me seriously.

http://tinyurl.com/winslowplan

 

 


Comment by TL Winslow
Entered on:


www.universityofreason.com/a/29887/KWADzukm