IPFS News Link • Economy - Economics USA
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Economy - Economics USA
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Housing
Real estate expert predicts huge changes in the housing market: 'Things are really breaking down
News Link •
Retirement
More and more retired Americans returning to work to cope with rising cost of living...
News Link •
Economy - Economics USA
Doug Casey on Insider Trading… Why Politicians Can Do it and You Can't
News Link •
Biden-Harris Deep Fake Administration
Millionaire Biden Treasury Secretary Yellen Gaslights Americans On High Grocery Bills
News Link •
Economy - Economics USA
11 Signs That The U.S. Economy Is In Far Worse Shape Than Most People Think
News Link •
Central Banks/Banking
Americans Chasing High Interest Rates Risk Falling Into a 'Cash Trap'
News Link •
Self-Help: Rational Living
Next Issue Of The Wild Bunch: Protecting Your Wealth During Peak Economic Crisis
News Link •
Economy - Economics USA
$1 Trillion in Interest Every Year: The Crushing Reality of Federal Debt
News Link •
Government Debt & Financing
1 Comments in Response to David Faber lets loose with his real opinion on Bank of America's new bailout
Back in Sept., Mark Haynes, Jim Cramer, and David Faber were emotional, and I laughed at them. I laughed at their emotion.
Now, I cannot convey the vehemence of the visceral reaction I just had watching that clip. Haynes and Cramer questioning that which literally brought them both to tears in September, and then Haynes saying, "You know, I wish I would have thought of it at the time. We should have given money to the bankers who were NOT in trouble."
Mark, I've got news for you. The money went to the banks that Paulson and Kashkari favored because THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAT IN FRONT OF A CAMERA AND BLUBBERED FOR! It went to the banks they determined were "not in trouble"!
But, I've still got to ask, (and since you're in a reflective mood, Mark, you may even ask yourself) why do banks that are not in trouble need any taxpayer money?