Public 'threatened' by private-firearms ownership

1-16-2008 • World Net Daily

Since "unrestricted" private ownership of guns clearly threatens the public safety, the 2nd Amendment can be interpreted to allow a variety of gun restrictions, according to the Bush administration. The argument was delivered by U.S. Sol

5 Comments in Response to Public 'threatened' by private-firearms ownership

Comment by Catherine

Entered on: 1/20/2008 2:32:23 AM

http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What part of infringed don't they understand?! Gggrrrrr.

Comment by PureTrust

Entered on: 1/16/2008 4:14:37 PM

When you get right down to the legal definitions, only government people are the public. They think the rest of us are, or are also, because government agreements that we have signed seem to say that we are. Of course, since they clouded that fact at the time of signing the agreements, UCC law nullifies the agreements.

Comment by Morpheus

Entered on: 1/16/2008 9:58:02 AM

Quit working! don't buy anything except food. close your bank account, buy gold what we need is a general strike!

Comment by bluejacket

Entered on: 1/16/2008 7:37:24 AM

Sounds like "Red Dawn" in real life.

Comment by James Higginbotham

Entered on: 1/16/2008 4:41:44 AM

Howdy..
this is total BS.
its the scare taticts of the pink pantie party DEMOCROOKS along with their RINO'S.
Jim.

Make a Comment (5) • Email Link • Send Letter to Editor