Jefferson and the gang didn't exactly fail. Rather, the people failed. At that time, the vastly larger percent of the people were either for England or else were undecided. People want their leader to do what they want him to do, but still be their leader. --- The Constitution (6th and 7th Amendments) offer a jury of your peers. Mistrial when they are not your peers. That's the way your judgment is the law of the land. --- If a person hasn't figured out how to require a 'court of record' and one that uses claims rather than complaints, that's failure. The failure has to do with the people not knowing how simple law is at its base. "Require that the injured party get on the stand, 'speak' and show the injury, provide a witness who 'saw' everything, or no case." --- Peruse the following site to see the basics. The only other thing is to stand present in court, not represented by anybody, not even yourself. http://voidjudgments.com/ - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8MAQEJZbuY

Jefferson should not have been surprised by the rise of parties, since he himself admitted they were inevitable: Wherever there are men, there will be parties... Those of firm health and spirits are unwilling to cede more of their liberty than is necessary to preserve order; those of feeble constitutions will wish to see one strong arm able to protect them from the many. These are the Whigs and Tories of nature... The Tories are for strengthening the Executive and General Government; the Whigs cherish the representative branch and the rights reserved by the States as the bulwark against consolidation. --THOMAS JEFFERSON, MISC NOTES, 1801