Here are some points SCOTUS will have to consider. 1) A citizen of the US is not a man/woman. Rather, the citizen is paperwork. If the man/woman stands in his/her man/woman capacity as owner of any property, the government is hands off. 2) The man/woman must stand in his/her man/woman capacity, not only think that he/she is doing so. The stand might have to be made by saying it directly. How many people know how to stand as a man/woman - not a citizen - and call their gun property rather than a gun? 3) Bills have tricky wording. Often the intent of the bill-maker is different than what the bill says, and he doesn't even realize it. SCOTUS will need to take the Bill wording into account with regard to whether or not it says/implies "citizen," or only "man/woman."