FREEDOM FORUM: Discussion

Make a Comment

Comments in Response


Comment by Andy Lamdin
Entered on:

Yep, Wickard Vs Filburn was an abuse of the Commerce Claus. That he was allegedly limiting interstate wheat sales by producing and selling wheat in the same state. None of his wheat crossed state borders.


Comment by Andy Lamdin
Entered on:

I stand corrected, he didn't sell his wheat.


Comment by Andy Lamdin
Entered on:

If Tim wants the general audience to understand a short squeeze he needs to do better. In the late 90s I traded commodity futures. Thus I know of puts and calls. I've traded currencies on forex for a long time. What's a short squeeze?

Make a Comment