FREEDOM FORUM: Discussion

Make a Comment

Comments in Response


Comment by Ed Martin
Entered on:

There is no such thing as a "Federal government", "BLM" , etc. The only thing that could possibly hurt the Hammonds is people. We need the names and addresses of those people.


Comment by Annette Grant
Entered on:

What this judge has done is illegal! And this needs to be brought out completely in the open. It doesn't even sound like the Hammonds were in court for this judgement! ...They have already served terms, it should have been an open and shut case, meaning closed or thrown out, according to this: Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges in the same case following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. In common law countries, a defendant may enter a peremptory plea of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict (autrefois means "in the past" in French), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offence and hence that they cannot be retried under the principle of double jeopardy. If this issue is raised, evidence will be placed before the court, which will normally rule as a preliminary matter whether the plea is substantiated; if it is, the projected trial will be prevented from proceeding. In some countries, including Canada, Mexico and the United States, the guarantee against being "twice put in jeopardy" is a constitutional right.

Make a Comment