CONNECTING THE DOTS
Malthus nailed it and Ehrlich cemented it: humans collide with their numbers
Frosty Wooldridge“The power of population is so superior to the power of earth to produce subsistence (food) to humanity that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race.” Thomas Malthus 1798
As a counterpoint to this fellow's piece, I suggest the following: http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-population-control-holocaust
Wooldridge's liberal blinders do not allow him to see solutions other than those precluding or ending human lives by the billions. I have jousted with him over the years, and witnessed his retorts to others as well. He refuses to acknowledge any scientific works which offer solutions accomodating an increasing human population. He ludicrously claims to be a "enlightened conservative" to wade into the paleoconservative BreakingAllTheRules.com forum with his anti-human rants. He is often insulting and illogical in responding to critics of his theories. If you read Frosty "the Snowman" Wooldridge's diatribes against humanity, you will see that all of us not living according to his standards, he feels, need to be eliminated. Is that not a statist liberal mindset?
No matter how you cut it, to deny human overpopulation illustrates a lack of intellectual understanding that NO species can continue unlimited growth beyond the carrying capacity of the planet. McElroy never brings a logical argument. He brings emotional and religious claptrap that will not sustain even the weakest mind. We must deal with human overpopulation or Mother Nature will become nastier and nastier and meaner and meaner.
Frosty, you snowman! You wouldn't acknowledge a logical argument if it slapped you in the face, which it has on repeated occasions. Your arrogance, bias, and total refusal to even admit that scientific and engineering studies negating your outdated and discredited "Population Bomb" do exist. I've sent a few of them your way, as have others. And I've never claimed human population can or should grow to infinity. But instead of responding with a logical, scholarly debate, you resort to ad hominem attacks and childish name-calling. You wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in Hell facing real scholars. You are scripted shill.
Let's say Frosty is right. If so, he's arguing for his own and his own offspring's ultimate eradication. Since, per his liberal mantra, selection will weed out the mentally feeble.