I could not even get past the first sentence without laughing and shaking my head in complete disbelief that someone could be so disengaged with reality.

People like you that must obviously get their history from Hollywood movies and the ADL scare the hell out of normal rational thinking people.

YOU are the typical uninformed extremist and have been for some time now.

You said: "Despite Muslim leaders re-affirming their contempt for our values in words and deeds"

Contempt for our values? LMFAO

How about contempt for being occupied? How about contempt for droning their nations?  How about contempt for causing mischief and riots across their countries? How about contempt for infecting their lawful nuclear sites with cyber war trojans? How about contempt for for terrorizing their scientists and murdering them and then bragging about it to the world? How about contempt for arming dictators around their nations. How about contempt for this nations hypocrisy? How about contempt for sanctions which is nothing more than an act of war? How about contempt for you giving Israel 20 billion a year and then they use that money to terrorize their nations?  How about contempt for blah, blah, blah, I could go on for days.

You sir need to turn off you clear channel radio and TV because you are a brainwashed statist

What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (15), the New York Post (16), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (17) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (18), and Yediot America, (19) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.

From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html