Anyone that reads the article will likely be surprised how supportive they are of the idea that you might think about resiting _before_ they close the sliding doors on the Cattle Car.

I certainly understand why Law-Enforcement would rather the people act like cattle until the end. But for them to purposely bring attention to this particular article (creating a flood of readers already) means that they either have not read it (likely for many LEOs) or they are advocating the idea that a Gov't Official should never ever under any circumstances be resisted.

I don't think they understand the debate that they have unleashed.

But don't think that your arguments are going to be met with a reasoned argument from them... they got guns and force and intimidation. And LEOs are trained to get their way one way or another,... and be proud of what they've done for... fill in the blank justification.

I simply advocate a peaceful understanding of all of the facts and as much understanding as possible... but I think that is what is the most threatening to those that rely so much on manipulation of information.

Which... BTW is why we can expect more Internet Control Legislation to become all the rage in legislative bodies.