Article Image

IPFS

US Heading for One-Party Rule?

Written by Subject: United States

US Heading for One-Party Rule?

by Stephen Lendman

Throughout the US/West, fantasy democracies run things — the real thing virtually banned.

Throughout Europe and in Canada, ruling regimes abandoned their sovereignty to a higher power in Washington.

Parties and political aspirants for peace, equity, justice and cooperative relations with other nations according to international law are considered enemies of the Western states where they're located.

In the US, things are heading toward one-party rule under undemocratic Dems if able stay empowered the old-fashioned way.

There's no ambiguity about brazen election theft 2020. 

With MSM support and encouragement, Dems intend to steal upcoming November midterms and 2024 election — if their diabolical aims aren't foiled.

In mid-September, the New York Post reported the following:

In cahoots with undemocratic Dems, "Facebook has been spying on private messages and data of American users…"

The notorious enemy of speech, press and academic freedoms is "reporting them to the FBI if they express anti-government or anti-authority sentiments — or question the 2020 election — according to (Justice Department) sources."

Noted journalist HL Menchen (1880 - 1956) long ago explained the following:

"The most dangerous (individual) to any government (is someone) able to think things out for himself (or herself), without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos." 

"Almost inevitably (they) conclu(de) that the(ir) government…is dishonest, insane, and intolerable."

During J. Edgar Hoover's reign of terror from 1935 - 1972 as FBI director, COINTELPRO Gestapo tactics targeted political activists and dissidents, including communists, anti-war, human and civil rights supporters, American Indian Movement and Black Panther Party members, Puerto Rican nationalists, the Chicano Movement, environmentalists, and others who justifiably challenged undemocratic state authority.

What Hoover called "threats to domestic tranquility" referred to activists for peace, equity, justice and the rule of law — what today's FBI considers domestic "terrorists."

Constitutional scholar Thomas I. Emerson (1908 - 1981) long ago warned about freedom-destroying FBI practices, saying:

The agency "jeopardizes the whole system of free expression which is the cornerstone of our society…"

Its extrajudicial actions raise "the specter of police state" rule.

"(T)he FBI conceives of itself as an instrument to prevent radical social change in America."

"The Bureau's view of its function leads it beyond data collection into political warfare."

From establishment in 1908 to the present time, its mission has been all about protecting privilege from beneficial social change, as well as denying due process and judicial fairness to society's most vulnerable.

Greatly aided by modern technology, America's Gestapo serves as a virtual agent for one-party rule under  undemocratic Dems.

If it's able to trample on the constitutionally protected rights of a former US president with impunity, no one is safe from its tyrannical reach.

The agency'a unannounced August 8 raid on Trump's Florida residence without just cause — to search and seize documents legally in his possession — was a shot across the bow against everyone undemocratic Dems consider a threat to their aim for one-party rule. 

It was an indisputable example of how the scourge of police state rule operates.

Supported by MSM — with few exceptions — the dominant US 4th estate is going all-out to keep undemocratic Dems empowered.

Virtually backing one-party rule, they're at war against so-called MAGA Republicans and DJT, wanting him prevented from getting another term as president — by any means able to accomplished this objective.

In print, the NYT is his main enemy.

There's plenty about Trump's time in office to criticize legitimately.

Yet the Times resorts to making stuff up in similar fashion to how it vilifies nations free from hegemon USA control — Russia is current prime target.

In its latest fake news edition, the Times quoted rubbish by its so-called White House reporter, Maggie Haberman, from her Trump-bashing book, titled:

"Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America (sic)."

Along with other fake news, it falsely blamed him for Capitol Hill violence on January 6, 2021 — what I earlier called America's Reichstag fire, strategically timed to elevate Hitler to power after 1933 general elections.

What happened on Capitol Hill was a staged incident by undemocratic Dems — a false flag to aid their elevation to power by brazen election theft, wrongfully blaming Trump for what he had nothing to do with.

While rioting staged by Dems was ongoing, Twitter locked Trump's account for around 12 hours, then permanently suspended it to block his First Amendment rights — further aiding Dem dark forces by operating in cahoots with them.

Haberman's book is an anti-Trump hatchet job by bending reality to fit her support for one-party rule under undemocratic Dems hostile to the former president.

Promoting her book in a September 25 Atlantic article, she mocked Trump's legitimate accusation of 2020 election fraud — what I called the most brazen in US history.

Ignoring reality and other illegal practices by Dems — notably their sanctions and hot war on Russia and support for the scourge of Nazism in Ukraine — Haberman slammed what she called Trump's "particularly brazen" way of operating in the "shady…world of New York (real estate) developers," adding:

He's "undeterred by the stain that January 6 left on his legacy (sic) and on the (fantasy) democratic foundations of the country (sic)" — what Dems bear full responsibility for, not Trump.

Yet her book and article were dedicated to vilifying Trump in support of one-party Dem rule — what the Times and most other MSM back, as well as America's Gestapo.

Hegemon USA isn't a normal country.

Along with waging war on humanity at home and worldwide, it's at war by hot and other means on Russia — a futile attempt to reverse today's multilateral rule, returning things to unipolar tyrannical control.

If Dems succeed in instituting one-party rule, the risk of crossing the line to possible nuclear war with Russia will be much greater than already.

Yet Republicans aren't going quietly into that good night.

Days earlier, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy revealed what he called a "commitment to America" agenda in the run-up to November midterms, saying:

"It's a one-party rule that…led to the disaster that we're in right now."

It'll take heavy lifting "to get us back on track. That's why we're here."

"As we went across this country listening, we heard the same thing, at the kitchen table, the dining room table, and inside the factory." 

" 'Can I afford it? Can I afford to fill up my tank?"

"Can I afford the food, the milk, the baby formula?' "

" 'Could you afford to give up one month of your wages? One month?' " 

According to a Heritage Foundation report:

Since Dems usurped power in 2020 and took office extrajudicially in January 2021, Americans lost an average of $4,200 in annual income because of soaring inflation.

What was left unexplained is that sanctions war on Russia along with unparalleled money printing madness caused prices of producer, as well as consumer goods and services to skyrocket. 

McCarthy's agenda is reminiscent of Speaker Newt Gingrich's 1994 Contract with America.

Given today's dismal economic conditions, what's likely to worsen ahead with the vast majority of Americans struggling to get by, will Republicans be able to win House and/or Senate control in upcoming midterms?

Can they overcome the diabolical intent by Dems to stay empowered by election-rigging in similar fashion to how they stole election 2020?

It won't be easy to foil what undemocratic Dems have been planning for some time.

thelibertyadvisor.com/declare