IPFS
The r3VOLution,... and Ron Paul's role in it.
Written by Ernest Hancock Subject: EugenicsThe r3VOLution,… and Ron Paul’s role in it.
There will come a time, sooner or later, when Ron Paul will
inform his supporters that he will no longer be available as a candidate for
President of the United
States. The only real important question is
when that will happen. Most are interested in the question, ‘will it be before
or after the Republican National Convention?’
I’m certain that this election cycle will produce several
“r3VOLution” books that will help provide several perspectives of what the past
year and a half has meant to Americans and others around the world,… the more
the better. I am of the opinion that no one will be able to claim a full
understanding of what happened and why, even Ron Paul openly expresses his
constant surprise. But Dr. Paul did make the enlightened observation that
‘freedom brings us all together’. My bumper sticker phrase on the subject has
for many years been, “There are those that just wish to be left alone,… and
there are those that just won’t leave them alone”. I use this rhetoric to help
explain how you can tell where the line is for determining who the Bad Guys
are. And when enough individuals insist on expressing their preference of being
left alone it is often a clear sign of the beginnings of a revolution.
Dr. Paul provided the focus many freedom supporters have
long sought in their effort to make their desires known. Ron Paul represented
an easily understood libertarian philosophy that was consistent as it was
applied to any issue of importance. To a very wide portion of our society (and
in the minds of many around the world) the Philosophy of Liberty
provided an ‘epiphany moment’ in their lives.
Once the philosophy of liberty was directly compared, in
real time to a very wide audience, with those that have claimed ruling status
over our lives for many decades, the world changed.
The “Ron Paul Revolution” is a libertarian revolution. With
or without Ron Paul the ideas are now well established in enough minds to have
hope. This well vetted philosophy transcends politics and will forever be part
of the American culture. Now many thousands of very young liberty lovers have
the renewed ability to explain and represent the message that has made Ron
Paul’s effort so successful. Ron Paul’s success can be directly attributed to
his full support of this consistent philosophy. Libertarianism/Olde School
Conservatism? was applied to the issues he explained in full to anyone that
would take the time to listen. There have been disagreements on some issues but
the differences are often a matter of interpretation of some of the fine points
of libertarianism, priorities in the order of implementation of policies or a
simple argument over where collective government’s role should simply end.
The benefit of Ron Paul’s bravery and confidence is
incalculable and we all owe him a great deal of gratitude and respect.
From the beginning I worked very hard to remain supportive
without ever being tempted to get too close to the “political campaign”. I made
it very clear to as many as possible, that I and those that supported my
efforts were focused on the freeing of as many minds as possible. Never did we
advocate any particular action inside or outside of party politics. Our efforts
were laser beam focused on the education of individuals on various techniques
of expressing their individual desires to be left alone. The Ron Paul
Revolution was an effective vehicle for accomplishing that. Those that chose
getting more involved within the political structure took what they learned and
shared it with others. Good or bad, we all learned from each other. Every part
of America
has its own laws, rules and issues that only the locals know how to utilize or
avoid in pursuit of what is important to those that are actively doing
something,… anything.
I have been an outspoken critic of ‘collectives’. Any
organizing effort that first strives to create a structure can expect that the
organization created will eventually become more important to those in charge
than the issue or mission claimed to be the reason for the creation of the
organization in the first place. I insulate myself from such distractions by
asking, what is the goal of this organizing effort. I then decide if I wish to
help, and if I am supportive of the effort, I help. I don’t need a title or a
shiny badge to express my individual support of a worthy goal. Now this isn’t
an absolute. I am registered as a Libertarian and benefit from the ballot
status we have worked so hard for here in Arizona to be able to present our ideas
inexpensively during the campaign season. But the attitude of looking at such
structures as a tool rather than a goal in itself has served many of us very
well.
When an organization becomes less a tool and more of a leash
I see it as counter productive in the advocacy of liberty. The diversity of
individuals acting in concert with others that are not fettered, limited or
regulated by the desires of others is of great benefit. Any individual wishing
to make it clear that an activity they didn’t support was not pursued in their
name or with their support is much easier when a structure isn’t involved. And
the requirement to find a consensus of a collective before something is even
planned eliminates the possibility of spontaneous diversity that was so common
over the last year and a half.
I share these thoughts now because I fear that there is a
misreading of what has been happening during this reawakening of the American
Spirit. I must first point out that I am of the opinion that my individual
opinion will have very little effect on anything. Far too often I have found
that my understanding of something in the realm of politics has been equated
with my causing it to happen.
Should Ron Paul decide to close his campaign for the
Presidency of the United States before the nomination of John McCain I am of
the opinion that the fall out will be far more devastating to his future plans
than he may understand. For the same reasons that the r3VOLution was such a
surprise to him and his close circle of staff and supporters, I suspect that
they will be just as surprised by the disappearance of that support should he
pull the plug on his campaign before the GOP nomination process.
Inside the campaign, the desire to inject some traditional
conservative/libertarian philosophy into the Republican Party, and the minds of
individual Americans, was all that could have been hoped for by those that have
been operating under the thick cloud of GOP NeoCon domination as they did their
best to advocate for more liberty. But the Internet made political parties
anachronistic and overnight demonstrated the power of individuals to self
organize without rules, limits or controls.
Meetups were a natural evolution. But once begun on its own the spontaneous organization was almost immediately replaced with a Meetup hub from inside the Ron Paul
campaign. My immediate fear was the creation of a ‘Shiny Badge’. These new Meetup
organizations took the common goals of individuals and added the goal of central
organization. Too often the goal to create a structure was the primary
activity. Competing hierarchies dominated the time of too many hoping to be
supportive. Ironically the most effective and productive in the spreading of
support for Ron Paul and his message were the most abused as they threatened
the superiority of those “in charge” of the newly created and anointed
collective of the campaign. I spent most of my time across the country
encouraging those that would not ask permission or be dictated to. Too many
Meetups attracted those with the belief that “If you are not _in_ control,..
then you are _out_ of control”. I sought to encourage the efforts of those that
refused to be controlled while doing my best to avoid criticism of those
passionate about exerting control.
Many inside the Ron Paul campaign believe that support of
Dr. Paul’s continued presence in the race for the GOP nomination is due to an
unrealistic fantasy that he may win. My first reaction is “So?”, but I am of
the opinion that the support of Dr. Paul remaining in the race for POTUS is
more about having a vehicle to express their dissent with what is going on in America.
As I write this on June 8th 2008 it is clear that
the United States economy may not survive in its present form until the
Republican National Convention, that in response to this knowledge we have an
even greater chance of an undeclared War with Iran. We have the government
admitting (not able to hide any longer) the largest increase in unemployment
figures in 22 years, the dollar plummeting in value, precious metals
skyrocketing and energy cost spiraling up with no limit in sight.
By the time of the Republican National Convention in
September the political landscape is likely to be unrecognizable to what we are
now experiencing. Everything that Ron Paul predicted is happening at an
accelerated pace. And should Dr. Paul deny his uncommonly devoted supporters
their voice at the height of the greatest economic, political and spiritual
storm this nation has experienced since the beginning of this revolution in the
1770’s, I fear the dissipation of significant amounts of support for any
future plans of Dr. Paul.
A long term gratitude and appreciation of Ron Paul and his
family is certain, but the continued advocacy of Dr. Paul as their spokesperson
would be in doubt should the most active feel a sense of abandonment.
The creation of a new organization by Ron Paul and his long
time/new close supporters would certainly be welcome should he continue through
the GOP Convention. But should the hope, dreams and voice of tens (if not
hundreds) of thousands be taken away and replaced with disappointment, then I
suspect that the request for them to support the dreams of others in a newly
formed organization would go unheard by many.
Of even greater importance are the types of people that
would flock to an opportunity to begin a new organization bearing the name of
Ron Paul and those that would tend to avoid such an effort. I support goals,
and tend not to support organizations with goals. I can certainly be counted on
to continue the r3VOLution in one form or another in the effort to free as many
minds as possible, but I am likely to look skeptically at the need for an
organization that is more often than not created in the image of the government
that dictates its structure, focus and methods. The very idea that you can use
a political machine designed by government in the opposition of that very
government’s effort to control us is an issue of interest, and often much
debate.
I encourage Ron Paul to stay in the race for the Republican
Nomination for as long as is possible. I believe it to be in his best interest
and in the interests of any future effort he may wish to pursue. Since
mid-April I have seen to my conscience by making my opinions clear to all of
those that I felt the need to share them with so that I had the maximum
influence possible. I have shared many anecdotes that demonstrated support for
my opinion and I have written this article in an effort to provide some
understanding for future generations. As I have said, I do not consider my
opinions to rival the power of hundreds of thousands of individuals expressing
themselves independently. I only hope to provide a perspective and an
explanation that can be of service (and save me having to repeat this opinion
hundreds of times verbally :)
Peace,
Ernest Hancock
Publisher – FreedomsPhoenix.com
1 Comments in Response to The r3VOLution,... and Ron Paul's role in it.
I consider myself to be a dedicated grassroots RON PAUL R3volutionary and I work tirelessly to spread HOPE FOR AMERICA.
As Ron Paul wrote:
"Each of us should choose which course of action we must take: education, conventional political action or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes, but let it not be said that we did nothing"