"If logic and reason, the hard, cold products of the mind, can be relied upon to deliver justice or produce the truth, how is it that these brain-heavy judges rarely agree? Five-to-four decisions are the rule, not the exception. Nearly half of the court must be unjust and wrong nearly half of the time. Each decision, whether the majority or minority, exudes logic and reason like the obfuscating ink from a jellyfish, and in language as opaque. The minority could have as easily become the decision of the court. At once we realize that logic, no matter how pretty and neat, that reason, no matter how seemingly profound and deep, does not necessarily produce truth, much less justice. Logic and reason often become but tools used by those in power to deliver their load of injustice to the people. And ultimate truth, if, indeed, it exists, is rarely recognizable in the endless rows of long words that crowd page after page of most judicial regurgitations."
Oh, the frivolous nature of the gullible masses, the uncertainty of right and wrong, the immediate acceptance by half the population at every court session, the unconditional acceptance by each side of the political spectrum after each decision in their favor; all amidst the very nefarious and completely illogical workings of an openly corrupt and politically motivated cast of bought and paid for judges. The 'Supreme' Court mirrors the ignorant public; how else could the hypocrisy, contradiction, evil intent, and obvious collusion of nine judges not be seen as the fraudulent political spectacle that it is?
The 'Supreme' Court is charged with ruling on matters based on the constitutionality concerning so-called law. This notion is fatally flawed from the onset, as the constitution of no authority, a scrap of political paper drafted and implemented by manipulative politicians for the sole purpose of attaining unlimited power, muddies greatly the water of ethics by design.