Article Image
IPFS News Link • Economy - International

A different way to think about the Evergrande collapse

•, Simon Black

As Fordyce was a widely respected London banker and senior partner at the firm Neale, James, Fordyce, and Down, this behavior was uncharacteristic… and his family was rightfully worried.

The next morning Fordyce was gone. He had fled across the English Channel to France. And then the news struck– his bank had gone bust and was closing its doors.

By itself this shouldn't have been a big deal; it was only one guy, and one bank.

But Fordyce hadn't simply made some bad investments with his own money. Nor had he simply made bad investments with his depositor's money.

Fordyce had borrowed HEAVILY, from just about everyone, and made a number of spectacularly terrible investments.

Fordyce's borrowings had become so vast, in fact, that when he defaulted it nearly brought down the entire financial system.

Stock prices crashed. Banks shuttered. Financial markets in foreign countries, including the Netherlands, took a big hit.

And the British Government passed the Tea Act in order to raise tax revenue, stabilize the economy, and help the East India Company's recovery.

The Tea Act proved to be wildly unpopular in the colonies, leading to the infamous Boston Tea Party… which was a major precursor to the American Revolution.

Now, I'm not saying that Fordyce caused the American Revolution. The Revolution would have probably taken place eventually, even without Fordyce's catastrophic stupidity.

But it is incredible how a single event can trigger a widespread chain reaction with such far-reaching consequences.

Yesterday we saw a tiny glimpse of this; stock markets around the world collectively had a minor hissy fit in response to news that a Chinese property developer– Evergrande– would default on its colossal debt.