![Article Image](https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/533-0827072713-facebook-censorship2.png)
IPFS News Link • Censorship
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Finally Admits Biden-Harris Regime Pressured Him to Censor...
• https://www.thegatewaypundit.com, By Jim HoftMeta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is now trying to save himself from the controversial relationship between his company and the Biden-Harris regime.
In a letter addressed to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, Zuckerberg throws the Biden-Harris regime under the bus.
He openly admitted that Meta, the parent company of Facebook, was subjected to relentless pressure by the Biden administration to censor content related to COVID-19, even when the content was satirical or humorous, and the infamous Hunter Biden laptop.
The Meta CEO allegedly expressed deep 'regret' for not being more vocal in resisting the government's demands, stating that "government pressure was wrong," and he now recognizes that his company should have been more outspoken about the administration's overreach.
In the letter, Zuckerberg detailed how senior officials from the Biden administration, including the White House, exerted consistent pressure on Meta's teams to remove or suppress content that did not align with the regime's narrative on COVID-19.
This included posts that were clearly humorous or satirical.
Zuckerberg's letter also revealed another explosive detail: Meta's decision to demote the New York Post's bombshell story on the Biden family's corruption in the lead-up to the 2020 election.
The story, which centered around Hunter Biden's dealings with Burisma, was initially flagged by the FBI as potential Russian disinformation, leading Meta to temporarily suppress its distribution.
However, Zuckerberg now admits that this was a grave mistake, as the story was not Russian disinformation, and the decision to demote it was influenced by government pressure.
Zuckerberg also addressed the financial contributions he made through the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, called the Zuckerbucks by election integrity advocates, during the last presidential election cycle, which he insists were intended to support electoral infrastructure in a 'non-partisan manner.'