Kirstin Downey's recent article ("The Struggle Over Towering Wind Farms Is At The Center Of A Honolulu City Council Debate," Sept. 21) rightly highlights the Kahuku community's critical role in helping to inform public opinion regarding the negative community impacts of industrial wind power plants.

She writes: "When they first arrived in Hawaii about a decade ago, the turbines were initially welcomed but North Shore residents were shocked by their huge size and disturbed to learn they posed deadly hazards for endangered wildlife, particularly the opeapea bat on the North Shore. But opposition hardened when the big towers came to Kahuku three years ago."

While that's accurate (although the first wind turbines arrived on the Big Island's South Point in 1987), it overlooks the role of the Lanai community's opposition to the now defunct Big Wind proposals for Lanai and Molokai in Hawaii's love/hate affair with industrial wind power plants.

First proposed in 2007 — 15 years ago — Big Wind on Lanai was David Murdock's and then-Gov. Linda Lingle's scheme to install 170 wind turbines that would irretrievably alter — and environmentally destroy — almost 25% of Lanai's land. The giant turbines would generate electricity to be delivered via an undersea cable to power Oahu's ever-increasing demand for electricity.

The project divided this small island of 3,000 people in ways that are still being felt today. It was touted as a panacea for those hungry to achieve the state's goal of 100% renewable energy. But to many Lanaians, it was seen as an environmentally destructive scheme designed primarily to enrich the landowner.