Chelsea Clinton wants to talk about grifting. That's just great.

The fruit, apparently, doesn't fall that far from the global elitist narrative tree.

Perhaps looking to ride the coattails of those ganging up on "controversial anti-vaxx misinformation" (read: any uttered thought not handed down by Dr. Anthony Fauci from the heavens above) or perhaps looking to drum up support by her Twitter sycophants, Chelsea Clinton took to her Twitter account last week to lash out at Substack for providing a platform for free speech and for people to voluntarily subscribe to newsletters they're interested in and willing to pay for.

Wow, sounds nefarious, Chelsea! Glad you stepped in.

The first daughter took exception with the "anti-vaxx grift" that is supposedly taking place on here on Substack, citing a Guardian article written last week as her source.

"A group of vaccine-sceptic writers are generating revenues of at least $2.5m (£1.85m) a year from publishing newsletters for tens of thousands of followers on the online publishing platform Substack, according to new research," the Guardian wrote last week.

"Why is Substack facilitating science denialists' ability to profit from destructive lies (and comfortable profiting themselves)?" Clinton asked.

The research for the article was performed by an organization called the Center for Countering Digital Hate (of course that's what its called). Because if anything says "digital hate" nowadays, it's considering both sides of a story before critically thinking and arriving at your own conclusions.