Evidence of election fraud includes: eyewitness testimony, visual evidence such as total votes counted for Trump dropping on live television, statistical anomalies that indicate criminal fraud, expert testimony, credible proponents, unconstitutional changes in election laws, lack of evidentiary hearings as most cases were thrown out on technicalities, obstructionism to prevent discovery of potential fraud, Big Tech propaganda, and the election's failure to pass the smell test, as Trump earned more votes than any sitting president in history and still allegedly lost. -GEG

Out of 90 election integrity lawsuits that have been decided, only 25 were decided on the merits of the cases, and Trump or Republicans prevailed in 18 out of those 25 cases. Click here for the full breakdown of the cases.

American Thinker:

It's frustrating to hear people on the Right, including some who should know better, claim there's "no evidence" of significant, possibly outcome-changing fraud in the last presidential election — even as the forensic audit in Arizona uncovers multiple discrepancies.  

Clearly, they're confusing "evidence" with "proof."   

No, there may not be absolute, incontrovertible proof of election fraud — yet.  But there is plenty of evidence, good reasons a rational person might question the outcome.  Here are ten that come to mind, in no particular order:  

Eyewitness testimony.  Since November 3, hundreds of people have come forward to report that they personally witnessed various irregularities in the vote-counting process: ballots run through tabulating machines multiple times; "pristine" mail-in ballots; ballots that appeared to have been printed on different paper or filled out by machines — the list goes on.