If you haven't watched my video yet, you should definitely do so. And then you should go read that New York Times article for yourself. (But read it at this link to avoid giving the Old Grey Presstitute your click.)
When you do read the article, you'll see that it is an obvious limited hangout—that is, the deliberate revelation of some information in order to prevent the discover of other, more important information. This observation tells us two things:
That there is novel and compelling information about the CIA's covert propaganda programs contained in the article; and
that that novel and compelling information is not the whole story.