There's a lot of weird and bad information these days about the federal law known as Section 230. The New York Times even put out an op-ed trying to fight the common myth that social media companies are "platforms" that lose legal protections provided by Section 230 if they start making editorial decisions like "publishers." (In reality, the law makes no distinction and requires no such neutrality.) Nonetheless, the Times has started spreading its own extremely misguided analysis of the law. So misguided that the paper was forced to issue a correction, after running a headline on the front page of Tuesday's business section claiming that Section 230 legalized hate speech and was why "hate speech on the internet is a never-ending problem."
On Tuesday afternoon, Times writer Daisuke Wakabayashi tweeted "Disclosure: We are correcting this story and headline because it incorrectly suggests that Section 230 protects hate speech. The first amendment already does that."
Tech lawyers and others have been deservedly dragging the paper:
Disclosure - We are correcting this story and headline because it incorrectly suggests that Section 230 protects hate speech. The first amendment already does that. I should have written that better and more precisely. The corrected version is here https://t.co/KUmcAhKEQv— Daisuke Wakabayashi (@daiwaka) August 6, 2019