Because police "cannot cope" with the "huge" influx of reports on child abuse, they now say pedophiles whose 'only' crime is viewing child pornography should undergo rehabilitation — instead of going to prison.
In a mere three years, child abuse reports have skyrocketed in volume by 80 percent; and, as Chief Constable Simon Bailey of the National Police Chiefs' Council and head of Operation Hydrant, "which is investigating multiple allegations of historic sexual abuse across the UK," the BBC reports, "knew his view would cause nervousness and draw headlines.
"But he said the numbers of reports of abuse were at 'huge proportions' — an NSPCC study in late 2016 used figures which suggested the number of individuals looking at such images could exceed half a million."
Child pornography, indeed an incredibly serious crime from any standpoint, seems to have erupted in popularity — Bailey told BBC Radio 4's Today program around 400 people each month are arrested by police working with the National Crime Agency for viewing indecent images.
"There are undoubtedly tens of thousands of men that are seeking to exploit children online with a view to meeting them," he continued, "with a view to then raping them and performing the most awful sexual abuse upon them.
"That's where I believe our focus has got to be. They are the individuals that pose the really significant threat."
Bailey's stance isn't unfamiliar to the dark realm of child sexual abuse, but it's exceedingly unusual for a police official of such high rank to advocate re-prioritizing criminality — particularly given the murkier crime at hand perpetuates and fuels the cycle.
Without providing statistics or references, Bailey championed referrals to rehabilitation for viewing child porn, saying they "increasingly are effective" — as would be vacating the court system of these cases, to "speed things up."
Because the child abuse and exploitation is so rampant, the overwhelmed chief constable believes the imperative to target the worst pedophile offenders far outweighs the severity of the crime of viewing explicit images — despite the latter being a serious, repeat transgression against the victim.
"Every time an image is viewed, the victim is being victimised again and there is nothing as abhorrent. But we have to be able to manage the totality."