Article Image
News Link • Police State

Police Say It's Unconstitutional To Mandate Drug Testing On Officers

• http://www.trueactivist.com

In an incredibly backwards display of irony, the union representing the Pittsburgh police has filed a most unusual lawsuit. A civil rights grievance has been filed against the city, claiming that officers being required to undergo mandatory drug testing is not only a violation of their contract but of the Constitution as well.

Curiously enough, it appears that this unconstitutionality only applies to police officers, not to the public that they are meant to protect and serve. The officers' argument is that a urine drug analysis constitutes an "illegal search and seizure," and police would be forced to "forfeit their constitutional rights to protect the city from a civil liability."

Officers may be subjected to drug testing in three circumstances:

If an officer is suspected of being under the influence on the job;

If an officer fires their weapon;

If the officer is involved in a car crash.

The lawsuit arose as a result of a car chase and crash on Baum Boulevard. As the officers were involved in the car chase that led to the car crash, both were ordered to submit to testing. Pittsburgh Police Chief Cameron McLay contends that the contract allows the squad to test officers involved in pursuit, regardless of whether or not they were involved in the crash.

Credit: TheFreeThoughtProject.com



 

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by Joe Tittiger
Entered on:

What do the piggies have to hide? Ever have the swine use that line on you?


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:


Attorney For Freedom