Arizona Election Fraud: Judge Kyle Bryson's Ruling Prompt's Motion for a New Trial

07-17-2012 • The Intercept

"The ease of cheating when matched with the impossibility of challenging any specific election requires court intervention in order to protect the purity of elections and ensure that we will have free elections.” - Attorney Bill Risner Judge Kyle Bryson's decision was so far off the mark Attorneys Bill Risner and Ralph Ellingwood have decided to file a motion for a new trial instead of appealing the judge's opinion. According to their motion, "The court's ruling of May 4, 2012 was contrary to law. This court should correct its ruling and erroneous judgement and require the county to file its answer to the counterclaim filed on October 3, 2008. " A new trial was anticipated due to the inherent flaw of the ruling, which tries to guess what the plaintiff's anticipated remedy for prospective relief would be. After speculating what the plaintiff wants, Bryson rules erroneously over the legality of their request in direct contradiction to what the appellate court had already allowed