IPFS News Link • Political Parties
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Political Parties
Pity the poor essayist, trolling around for the quintessential anecdote for how the GOP has needlessly alienated soccer/security/nom du jour moms in its quest to brand anyone who has ever used contraception with a scarlet S. Do you revisit Rush calling Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a "slut" and a "prostitute" for daring to talk about the need for contraception, including for non-sex-related medical uses? Yes, perfect, though perhaps a better example of what happens when a Beckian blatherskite forgets that advertisers are a fickle lot. Maybe the time when Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) refused to have Fluke—or any woman—appear before his all-male subcommittee on the bishops-versus-birth control fight?
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Political Parties
When it comes to government planes and political trips, who pays for a president's campaign trav
News Link •
Political Theory
What if East vs West Was the Same False Dichotomy as Left vs. Right? – Video #99
News Link •
Political Parties
Whitney Webb Interview – Manufacturing Bipartisan Consent For Biometric Surveillance
News Link •
Political Theory
Stephen A. Smith Says Democrat Lawfare Against Trump Proves They're Scared...
News Link •
Political Parties
A Reliable Voting Bloc For Decades, Minorities Now Look For Alternatives To Democrats
News Link •
Political Parties
Ep. 88 Is Speaker of the House Mike Johnson being blackmailed to do the bidding of the left?
News Link •
Politics: Democratic Campaigns
Tucker STUNNED As Tulsi Gabbard Revels Who REALLY Runs America
News Link •
Politics: Democratic Campaigns
Nothing's better for Republican unity than Democratic lunacy!
News Link •
Politics: Democratic Campaigns
1 Comments in Response to WTF, GOP?
Within a couple of months after the 2008 elections, I began writing a book.
The book lamented the Republican Party's obvious lack of vision and the oncoming disaster(s) represented by the Obama administration.
I had been aware for a long time that the two major parties provided two slightly different options in rhetoric and almost no difference in actual policies.
The slightly different rhetorical options consist largely of gun rights and religious rights. The DNC wants to take the guns and inhibit free exercise. The GOP wants to let people keep their guns while establishing a theocracy.
These descriptions of differences in rhetoric are caricatures of the differences. The differences in rhetoric are actually somewhat less than that.
The differences in policy are much less than that.
In my book, I advocated actually promoting the general welfare.
The two major parties seem bent on getting 50.0000001% of the vote. And such are the results. By doing this, the two major parties reveal an apparent strategy of promising as little as they can to acquire a seat. Once the seat is gained, nearly all candidates head to the trough and are never heard from except at election time.
I never expected the GOP to adopt the plan I wrote into my book. Neither did I expect them to be just as lost, if not moreso, in 2012 as they obviously were in 2008.
Here we are.
The pundits mentioned in the article seem bent on rallying a bloc of voters around a series of hot-button issues. Even if you get the 50.000001% of the vote the GOP appears to be aiming for (again, just like in 2008, & just like the DNC), your supporters will not act coherently. Maybe that's the plan. The only problem is the outcome is a coin-toss. In this contest, one is just as likely to win as the other.
Ron Paul's sound money, common sense spending and defense plan will actually promote the GENERAL welfare.
His Tax Day Moneybomb was a flop. As yet, I've seen no official announcement concerning his plans. Here's hoping he can keep going.
DC Treybil