Vengeancia Please read this article on Federal Franchises.

"If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave." Samuel Adams 1772 http://musicians4freedom.com/solutions-to-perceived-problems/restore-the-repu...

"Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent." Bouvier's Maxims of Law, 1856

"It is locality that is determinative of the application of the Constitution, in such matters as judicial procedure, and not the status of the people who live in it." [Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 (1922)]

Watch the Video Here

And any attempt to take away this jurisdiction is null and void. When a federal constitutional question is raised in any of the trial courts of Colorado the right is given, and the duty is imposed upon those courts, by that instrument itself, to adjudicate and determine it. That right so given can neither be taken away nor that duty abrogated by the state of Colorado, by constitutional provision or otherwise, and any attempt to do so is null and void. Such pretended constitutional inhibition is no part of the constitution of the state of Colorado, and the judge's oath binding him to the support and enforcement of that instrument has no relation to such void provisions. People v. Western Union Tel. Co., 70 Colo. 90, 198 P. 146 (1921).

Americans, just like Alice in Wonderland, have gone "Through the Looking Glass!"

Find the most accurate information about the de Facto versus the de Jure governments and all things sovereign at:
http://sedm.org/

Your "Citizen" is a "Strawman." Proof that the "Strawman" exists:
http://musicians4freedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/StrawMan.pdf

Watch the excellent video from Infomatic Films:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko

Your "Strawman" is a Franchise of the Federal Corporation:
http://musicians4freedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Franchises.pdf

The song is called, "Someone Else's Life" from the album called, "The Curse of 1990" by the band called, Rotation:
http://rotation.bandcamp.com/track/someone-elses-life

Watch Another Video Here

Here's a sample Fee Schedule:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/66459977/Generic-Notice-of-Fee-Schedule-for-Colorad...

The republican form is defined as one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.

You can't DELEGATE rights that you don't have, now can you?

Tenth Amendment "Terrorism":
http://musicians4freedom.com/2011/09/16/tenth-amendment-terrorism/

The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable. Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356.

In the year 1297, the phrase, "Law of the Land," was used in the Magna Carta. Perhaps the most famous clause of Magna Carta states:

"No Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land."

This is sometimes called the "law of the land clause". The Magna Carta is among America's organic documents:
http://uscode.house.gov/download/ascii.shtml

7th Amendment: In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

The common law doctrine of estoppel by acquiescence is applied when one party gives legal notice to a second party of a fact or claim, and the second party fails to challenge or refute that claim within a reasonable time. The second party is said to have acquiesced to the claim, and is estopped from later challenging it, or making a counterclaim.