Trump Campaign Heading for a Showdown at the Supreme Court Corral?
by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org - Home - Stephen Lendman)
Despite some of the most brazen election fraud in US history — grand theft in key swing states for Biden/Harris over Trump — federal district judges and state courts ruled against the Trump campaign.
So far post-election, it lost or withdrew from around 30 lawsuits.
Pennsylvania District Judge Matthew Brann delivered the latest blow to Trump's reelection chances.
Defying reality, he said the following:
His lawyers failed to present "compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption (sic)," adding:
"Instead, this court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by the evidence (sic)."
"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state (sic)."
"Our people, laws, and institutions demand more (sic)."
In response to Brann's unacceptable ruling — upholding election fraud over an open, free, and fair process — Trump's legal team is seeking an expedited ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.
His lawyers believe it will "help us in our strategy" for the US Supreme Court to have final say up or down on brazen election fraud in key states.
Post-election, establishment media across the board, along with judges in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Nevada and Arizona, turned a blind eye to election-rigging for Biden/Harris over Trump.
On Monday, Pennsylvania and Michigan are scheduled to certify fraudulent election results — Nevada to follow on Tuesday.
Time is running out for Trump's legal team to achieve election justice over approval of sham results in contested states.
Attempts by Trump's legal team to get legislators in the above states to override court rulings for Biden/Harris by upholding evidence of brazen fraud are likely to fail.
According to the US Constitution's Article II:
"(E)ach state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct" Electoral College "electors" to vote for president and vice president.
While they're supposed to uphold the majority vote, each elector can go his or her own way in most states.
It occasionally happens but rarely. It's highly unlikely to go against the election outcome in contested or other states this time.
Election 2020 was stolen if brazen fraud for Biden/Harris over Trump is not reversed.
Days earlier he tweeted: "US Supreme Court should decide!"
Nine Supreme Court justices may have final say on how things turn out — though it's unclear if the High Court will take the case.
Most often, it declines to hear election-related cases. Will this time be different as in Bush v. Gore?
Much depends on how Trump v. Biden/Harris turns out. It's no ordinary case, but will it matter to the Supremes?
US deep state dark forces run things. It appears that they favor Biden/Harris over Trump.
If so, the Supreme Court may go along by either declining to hear Trump's case or ruling against it — no matter how valid the evidence of brazen fraud.
Despite election-rigging, Biden/Harris are likely to replace Trump on January 20 as things now stand.
If so, injustice will have been served.
The chance for a federal election process henceforth the way it should be will be nil.
If election results and the rule of law had epitaphs, it would say something like the following this time:
Here lies the republic. Challengers for its highest office lost to the incumbent but succeeded him in office anyway.
Courts to the highest level failed to uphold an open, free and fair process. It no longer exists.
VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.org (Home - Stephen Lendman). Contact at email@example.com.
My two Wall Street books are timely reading:
"How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War"
"Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity"