
The JP Morgan Effect
Written by Bill Bonner Subject: Economy - Economics USAWhat a marvelous flimflam! So obvious…and yet so effective! It’s a pleasure to watch.
Yesterday, the Dow soared over they 10,000 mark. If it keeps going
at this rate – up 144 points yesterday – it will soon equal the
post-’29 bounce. All we need is two more days and we’re there.
Oil rose over $75. Gold closed the day at $1,064, after a big move to the upside over the last few days. And the dollar fell – to just $1.49 per euro.
The reason for yesterday’s big move is announced on the front page of almost every financial rag this morning:
“JPMorgan profits lift the Dow.”
JPMorgan, the Wall Street firm that was bailed out by the feds a
year ago, reported income of $3.6 billion in the 3rd quarter. With that
kind of profit in the financial sector, it won’t be long before the
whole economy is running red hot, right?
That’s what the papers seem to think. The International Herald Tribune
says the bank’s profits are just another sign that a major recovery is
underway. Investors seem to believe it, too. “Earnings optimism,” is
behind the buying, says a broker.
But is it true? Is the real economy growing, expanding, and making money? Let’s look:
“Still on the job, at half the pay,” is a headline in The New York Times.
It tells the story of an airline pilot whose position has been
downgraded and whose pay has been cut in half. The fellow is now
earning $30,000 a year rather than $60,000. He is not counted in the
unemployment statistics but he has much less spending power than he had
a year ago. Practically all his discretionary spending power has been
wiped out.
The NYT:
“The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not track pay cuts, but it
suggests they are reflected in the steep decline of another statistic:
total weekly pay for production workers, pilots among them,
representing 80 percent of the work force. That index has fallen for
nine consecutive months, an unprecedented string over the 44 years the
bureau has calculated weekly pay, capturing the large number of people
out of work, those working fewer hours and those whose wages have been
cut. The old record was a two-month decline, during the 1981-1982
recession.
“What this means,” said Thomas J. Nardone, an assistant commissioner at the bureau, “is that the amount of money people are paid has taken a big hit; not just those who have lost their jobs, but those who are still employed.”
All over the country incomes are falling. Officially, about 15
million people have no jobs. Many others have given up looking for
jobs. And now, for the first time ever, more than half of those who
lose their jobs run out of unemployment benefits before they find
another one. Many others never get any benefits at all, because their
jobs are not eliminated, they are merely cut back…either in the number
of hours they can work or in the compensation itself.
Yesterday, we reported that Baby Boomers are actually working longer
hours…but earning less. The boomers are in an especially tight spot.
They’ve got only a few years to save money for their retirements…and it
won’t be easy in this slumpy economy.
And we reported the plight of the callow youths…whom BusinessWeek has called the “Lost Generation.” Their unemployment rate is twice the national average.
They’re at the bottom of the labor pool, and unless the economy begins
to expand they’ll have a very hard time finding the bottom rung of the
ladder.
Take all the people who are unemployed…who are working fewer
hours…who have given up looking for work…whose positions have been
downgraded…and add the family members who depend on them for their
daily bread…and you have nearly a quarter of the population. How can
companies expect to increase sales and profits with a quarter of the
population forced to cut back severely?
They can’t. The earnings numbers are misleading. Most of the
earnings that we’ve seen come from cost cutting, not growing top-line
sales. How do businesses cut costs? By trimming employees! In other
words, the earnings figures we’re seeing are contributing to the
slump…not alleviating it.
You can see how, in the short run this can lead to increased profits.
But it can’t go on for long. The more businesses cut costs the more
their sales go down, because consumers (who are also their employees)
have less money to spend.
And according to a Wall Street Journal report, with too much capacity…and falling sales, businesses “are hesitant to reinvest such profits into their businesses.”
That’s why business investment, as we reported two days ago, is
falling even faster than sales. And it’s why people who are looking for
a job are going to have a hard time finding one.
How did JPMorgan earn so much money in such a bad economy?
We begin with a bit of skepticism. After all, we know consumers aren’t borrowing.
Consumer credit is going down. So they can’t be making money there. And
we know businesses aren’t expanding, so they can’t be making money by
lending to corporations either.
Wait a minute. JPMorgan is a bank, right? Don’t banks make money by
lending money? Yes…that’s what we thought. Then who is JPMorgan lending
to?
The only net borrower is the government.
The Financial Times confirms that Morgan’s “US consumer
businesses continued to bleed, with its credit card unit losing $700
million in the quarter and its retail bank…barely breaking even.” It
wrote off $7 billion in uncollectible consumer loans – more than twice
as much as last year.
Its mortgage group lost money too. And it surely didn’t make any
money helping US business build new factories and expand payrolls.
So what does that leave? All the components of the business that have to do with the real economy are losing money or barely breaking even. What’s left?
The news reports attribute the huge profits to “trading.” But
trading is a broad category. And our guess is that if you look more
closely you will find that JPMorgan made its money the old fashioned way – by ripping off the government.
‘You mean, JPMorgan took the feds’ money and now is showing huge
profits because it is just lending money back to the people they got it
from? ‘
Yes. But not only that. They’re also probably speculating on gold, oil and stocks…along with everyone else. The feds’ money has pushed all these speculative trades into profit.
‘And now, they’re going to pay themselves big bonuses, aren’t they?’
Yes. The papers tell us, “bonuses explode on Wall Street to a new record.”
‘So, then…when the next crisis comes…they won’t have any money in the banks, will they?’
Nope.
‘So they’ll have to get bailed out again.’
Yep.
‘But maybe the next time the feds will wise up and just let them go broke.’
Not a chance. Wall Street has plenty of friends in the highest places in Washington.
A report in today’s media tells us that “Geithner Aides Reaped Millions
Working for Banks, Hedge Funds.” The aides earn about $150,000 for
their government work. On the side, they advise the financial firms
they’re supposed to be regulating, and get paid millions.
Such a nice relationship. They make sure Wall Street prospers – even
when it does stupid things. Wall Street makes sure they prosper – even
when they advise the government to do stupid things. And when their gig
is over in Washington they go back to Wall Street where they earn
millions more. America’s centers of political and financial power have
a cozy little game going. It won’t end any time soon. It’s too
profitable for both of them.
Until tomorrow,
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning
The JP Morgan Effect was originally published in the Daily Reckoning on October 15, 2009